Remembering My Hat

14th February 2013

Ageing masculinities seminar: Part 1

Filed under: Uncategorized — rememberingmyhat @ 15:19

Centre for Policy on Ageing / Centre for Ageing and Biographical Studies

Seminar 15 in the series ‘The representation of older people in ageing research’

Studies of Ageing Masculinities: Still in their infancy?

As usual, this is idiosyncratic notes of things that interested me, rather than a summary of what was said. [My own thoughts are in square bracket, like this]

[There’s a lovely picture of an older man here, which I can’t post just now for annoying technical reasons]

(cc) artisrams

Kate Davidson, Univ of Surrey

“Home alone: Exploring social networks of older divorced and never married men”

Retirement generally less of a break for most married men than for single men because their wives have already set up social networks independent of work, which they can join

For about 100 years, the proportion of men never married has remained the same. For women it has swung a little (partly effects of world wars). By 2033 it is predicted that for men over 65 this rate will increase from 7% to 15% and for women it will triple.

Men’s life expectancy is increasing more steeply than women’s.  Some demographers predict that by 2033 they will be the same, others agree they will converge but later – by the end of the 21st Century. Men doing less risky jobs with the decline of heavy industry, no major wars,  modern women more likely to smoke and drink, work and be stressed.

Older men that were easier to recruit were those who were white, professional, articulate and often invoke or respond to ‘helping other people’ as motivation for taking part in research. Disproportionate no. of ‘engineers’ as past occupation, for some reason!

Much easier to recruit married and widowed men than divorced and never married men.

Interviewer effects – one olderish man (Tom Daly), doing most of the interviews, one middle-aged woman (Kate Davidson) doing some. Not really enough data to generalise but most of what they talked about was similar regardless of interviewer. But they were much more likely to talk about erectile dysfunction to Kate and about how well they had done in their jobs to Tom.

Didn’t get any snowball sampling at all from the men themselves. Golf club members – asked them if knew any other men could talk to, said no. Woman member  suggested 4, who turned out all to know each other. But hadn’t suggested each other.

Health was the Trojan horse – that’s what got them in – ‘we are interested in health’.

Paul Simpson, Manchester

“Making sense of middle-aged gay men’s stories of ageing: Alienation, ambivalence, agency”

Methodological focus

Based on his PhD study of middle-aged gay men in Manchester

[I know Paul’s work well, so that’s why I haven’t taken many notes – not because it isn’t interesting!]

Interviews but also covert participant observation, as a way of getting beyond the account to the bodily stories [But then you have to reconcile the different types of data and the different types of knowledge claim you can make. I think I might want to think more about this] Rachel Thompson (2009 ) has written about benefits of strategic pick ad mix analytical framework.

Kate Bennett, University of Liverpool

“‘I thought I could look after her as good as anybody’: How older widowers’ reconstruct their masculinity”

Interviewees aged 55 – 98

Loss of wife is tricky issue for trad masculinity – need to grieve but in appropriate, masculine ways that don’t do ‘sissy stuff’. How do they maintain or reconstruct their masculine identities after death of wife?

Branon 1979 typology of men’s roles:

  • no sissy stuff (talking about emotions)
  • sturdy oak (reliable, dependable)
  • big wheel (important in their worlds)
  • giv’ em hell (driving fast cars, drinking too much, womanising)

Kate’s men demonstrated first three but not last [because she was a woman? Seems to me that the fourth is a man-to-man kind of style of speech. Was Branon a man?]. Written up in Jnl of Aging Studies, 2007 ‘No sissy stuff’.

Kirsi et al. 2000 typology of characteristic types of speech of men caring for wives:

  • factual speech (she had x condition. She died at three o’clock)
  • agentic speech (I made her go to the doctor’s)
  • familistic speech
  • destiny speech

Kate’s use of this written up in Ageing and Society 2013, with van der Hoonard and someone else.

Advertisements

1 Comment »

  1. […] Idiosyncratic notes from the afternoon session – in no sense a representative summary of the discussion. For an equally non-representational summary of the morning, see here. […]

    Pingback by Ageing masculinities seminar: Part 2 « Remembering My Hat — 14th February 2013 @ 16:48 | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: